Sample Answer 1:
Road safety has become a great concern for people with the rise of accidents and fatality those accidents cause every day. People have a varying opinion on how to make roads safe and I believe strict laws should be there to punish the driving offenders but a combination of other methods would bring better results.

On the one hand, people seem to abide by a law or rule when they know that violation would bring severe retribution. For instance, in some Asian countries pedestrians used to cross the roads and when a more rigid penalty has been imposed, those very people started using the underpass. From this perspective, strict penalty and fine can certainly improve the road safety as people would be more cautious and afraid of the consequence of the violation of the traffic laws. As an outcome, it is a fact that, the sterner the punishment, the greater chances that people would follow the rules.

On the other hand, there are already severe punishments for driving offenders including ceasing the driving license, monetary fines and imprisonments. Despite this, the number of road accidents is increasing every year. This is why I believe that only punishment cannot ensure the road security and safety. A combination of other initiatives is also required. First, we need to aware people about the devastating consequences traffic rule violations can bring to our life. Second, the requirements for passing the driving test should be standardised and made more practical, especially in developing countries where people can use advantages of the corruption. It is often noticed that many young people are given driving license without scrutinising their experience and skills. This should be completely avoided and after a certain period, each driver should be retested. Third, unfit vehicles should not be allowed to run on the roads as these cars cause more accidents according to the recent Road Transport Authority report. Finally, the traffic system of a country should be modernised and more surveillance cameras and speed test cameras should be there.

To conclude, punishment to traffic rule violators is a good way to make the road safer but the combination of other steps would bring more desired results.

Model Answer 2:
At recent years, there is an ongoing debate whether giving dire punishment to driving offences are the best solution to overcome severe accidents in roads or not. While some support this idea, many others believe that governments should provide improvements in road safety. This essay will try to discuss both views with several considerations given underneath.

People are not prompted to engage safety driving because there are no regulations relating to drivers to be more careful on the road. It can be found in developing countries where the traffic is not well arranged and as a result, the numbers of terrible accidents remain dominant. Dissimilar with it, developed countries pay more attentions in this case by restricting the use of vehicles without licence limiting the top speed in certain busy areas such as boulevards and main roads, and imposing fine for all the offence forms in high rate, and as a result, these countries can overcome traffic accidents.

However, governments with all efforts must improve the infrastructure of safety riding. Traffic signs should be renewed, the facilities in the road are supposed to be changed, etc. so the drivers can recognise the driving surroundings vividly. Furthermore, technologies are also urgent to deal with daunting events in driving environment. It is good news that outrageously inventions have been created and applied but still attempts in technology findings are required.

In conclusion, while there are regulations to be defined, governments together with scientists, engineers, and car businessmen have to maximise in providing safety riding facilities to gain maximum result on this issue.

[ Written by - Angga Cool ]

Model Answer 3:
A group of people believe that in order to increase the safety for the driving on roads, governments should make stricter regulations for any indiscipline in driving attitudes. On the contrary, another group thinks that authorities should consider other effective solutions for it. The following essay will discuss both views in details, but in my personal opinion, I do believe that the combination of both ideas would ensure a better road safety.

On the one hand, many people worry about the number of driving accidents. Each year, the number of people who are injured or pass away due to traffic accidents has increased significantly. In most cases, accidents have occurred due to the interdisciplinary acts of the drivers themselves, such as speeding, drunk driving or using their mobile phones during driving. And to solve the problem, the government should make a strict regulation about traffic accidents. People who are found to be guilty of any driving rule violation should be punished with serious penalties and detentions. By having these kinds of policy, it is hoped that traffic accident rates will decrease gradually.

On the other hand, other people believe that strict punishments would not effectively solve the problem. There are other measures which governments and the public should consider. Firstly, governments could cooperate with the media in making campaign about safe driving. Television commercials and magazine advertisements could be used by the government in socialising about the negative effect of aggressive or offensive driving. Secondly, governments could also give rewards to their citizens who are obeying the road regulations. For example, when people renew their driving license, authorities could check their track records. Those who have clean track records could get motor vehicles tax discount or exemption.

In conclusion, people have a varying opinion on how to reduce the number traffic accidents. While some people believe that there should be stricter policies and regulations about driving, others think that there should be another effective way of addressing the issue. In my point of view, I believe that both policies have their own positive sides and when people could combine them, it would be an effective way of reducing traffic accidents.

[ Written by - Darwin Lesmana ]

Model Answer 4:
Nowadays, the accidents that occur on the road are likely to rise in number in some countries. While an army of people think that these issues can be tackled by penalising offenders strictly, others think that there are other steps that can be taken to cope with it.

It is clear that the strict punishments set up for the driving offences can make them fear to break the laws. For instance, if they are proven to disobey the applied rules, it is seemly a good way to punish them by taking their driving licenses forcefully. This measure is likely to alert them to think twice before breaking the laws because if they commit it they cannot drive anymore. This way can indirectly encourage them to obey the rules hence the accidents on the road are likely to be declined. The traffic rules are applicable only for the drivers, but also for the ordinary commuters as well. While an over-bridge or an under pathway is mandatory for crossing the busy roads, many people do not obey this rules. It is not unusual that many careless drivers do not follow the traffic signals and all these violations of traffic rules cause severe accidents and congestion in many cities. Hence, implementing strict punishment and fine can be one effective solution to tackle this issue.

On the other hand, many believe that other measures could be more successful to address this problem, including creating awareness among citizens to drive safely, organising seminars & training programmes about the importance of road safety and modernising the traffic control system. The research carried out by Statistics Center, an organisation at the University of Diponegoro, reveals that citizens in Semarang who have wide knowledge about how to drive safely tend to obey the applied rules if compared to the ones who does not have this knowledge. This makes clear that these measures can be utilised to create a consciousness to be safe riders.

Apart from that, the number of cars and buses on the roads in many cities is much higher and restricting the private car ownership can reduce the number of cars on the roads and thus the number of accidents or casualties. Improving the traffic system with modern equipment and enrolling more trained and professional traffic police could be another great way to tackle this issue.

To conclude, the establishment of punishment strictly is a wise idea but by presenting workshops and training programmes to all citizens, especially drivers of different vehicles, improving the traffic control system are the finest ways to encourage them to increase security on the way.

bài tham khảo hay do bạn tự làm??

Throwing parties can be expensive. While some people do not find these fancy parties worth what they cost, others believe parties are important to both individuals and the society.

People choose to throw parties for a number of reasons. For starters, parties can make better teams. Project kick-off parties are good opportunities to break the ice and help team members to know each other better. Victory parties create a sense of success and belonging. Companies do not see parties as wastes of money and allocate budget to support such events. Moreover, parties often leave good memories. From our own experiences, we all have happy memories of our birthday parties when we were little. Every family has great photos took on family parties in their album. In addition, contrary to what some people believe that spending on parties is a waste of social resources, parties actually create value, either by employing people in the party planning business or by offering people better party experiences.

P/s :Mk tìm đó,bạn tham khảo ý nha,còn mạch thì bạn nên tự viết vẫn hơn nhé!

dễ dịch mà

tự dịch đi

@nguyễn thảo nguyên

Tham khảo:

Today, many people argue that we should spend more money on restoring local ecosystems. From my point of view, people should prioritize restoring local ecosystems as it is crucial for the survival of our planet.

Firstly, the most important reason why we should restore local ecosystems is that they provide numerous benefits to both humans and animals. Ecosystems provide clean air, water, and food which are necessary for our survival. Without healthy ecosystems, we will face numerous problems such as air and water pollution, food scarcity, and natural disasters.

Secondly, we should invest in restoring local ecosystems because human activities such as deforestation and pollution have caused serious harm to our planet. These activities have led to the loss of biodiversity, soil erosion, and climate change. By restoring local ecosystems, we can help reverse some of these negative effects and preserve our planet for future generations.

Finally, neglecting the restoration of local ecosystems has led to the extinction of many species and the loss of habitats for others. It has also affected the lives and livelihoods of people who depend on natural resources for their survival.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that we should invest more money in restoring local ecosystems. It is essential for the survival of our planet, and it will provide numerous benefits to both humans and animals. By doing so, we can create a sustainable future for ourselves and the generations to come.

Today, many people argue that we should spend more money on restoring local ecosystems. From my point of view, people should prioritize restoring local ecosystems as it is crucial for the survival of our planet.

Firstly, the most important reason why we should restore local ecosystems is that they provide numerous benefits to both humans and animals. Ecosystems provide clean air, water, and food which are necessary for our survival. Without healthy ecosystems, we will face numerous problems such as air and water pollution, food scarcity, and natural disasters.

Secondly, we should invest in restoring local ecosystems because human activities such as deforestation and pollution have caused serious harm to our planet. These activities have led to the loss of biodiversity, soil erosion, and climate change. By restoring local ecosystems, we can help reverse some of these negative effects and preserve our planet for future generations.

Finally, neglecting the restoration of local ecosystems has led to the extinction of many species and the loss of habitats for others. It has also affected the lives and livelihoods of people who depend on natural resources for their survival.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that we should invest more money in restoring local ecosystems. It is essential for the survival of our planet, and it will provide numerous benefits to both humans and animals. By doing so, we can create a sustainable future for ourselves and the generations to come.

Tạm dịch:

Ngày nay, nhiều người tranh luận rằng chúng ta nên chi nhiều tiền hơn cho việc khôi phục các hệ sinh thái địa phương. Theo quan điểm của tôi, mọi người nên ưu tiên khôi phục các hệ sinh thái địa phương vì nó rất quan trọng cho sự tồn tại của hành tinh chúng ta.

Đầu tiên, lý do quan trọng nhất khiến chúng ta nên khôi phục các hệ sinh thái địa phương là chúng mang lại nhiều lợi ích cho cả con người và động vật. Các hệ sinh thái cung cấp không khí sạch, nước và thực phẩm cần thiết cho sự sống còn của chúng ta. Nếu không có hệ sinh thái lành mạnh, chúng ta sẽ phải đối mặt với vô số vấn đề như ô nhiễm không khí và nước, khan hiếm lương thực và thiên tai.

Thứ hai, chúng ta nên đầu tư vào việc khôi phục các hệ sinh thái địa phương vì các hoạt động của con người như phá rừng và ô nhiễm đã gây ra tác hại nghiêm trọng cho hành tinh của chúng ta. Những hoạt động này đã dẫn đến mất đa dạng sinh học, xói mòn đất và biến đổi khí hậu. Bằng cách khôi phục các hệ sinh thái địa phương, chúng ta có thể giúp đảo ngược một số tác động tiêu cực này và bảo tồn hành tinh của chúng ta cho các thế hệ tương lai.

Cuối cùng, việc bỏ qua việc phục hồi các hệ sinh thái địa phương đã dẫn đến sự tuyệt chủng của nhiều loài và mất môi trường sống cho những loài khác. Nó cũng đã ảnh hưởng đến cuộc sống và sinh kế của những người phụ thuộc vào tài nguyên thiên nhiên để tồn tại.

Tóm lại, tôi tin chắc rằng chúng ta nên đầu tư nhiều tiền hơn vào việc khôi phục hệ sinh thái địa phương. Nó cần thiết cho sự tồn tại của hành tinh chúng ta và nó sẽ mang lại nhiều lợi ích cho cả con người và động vật. Bằng cách đó, chúng ta có thể tạo ra một tương lai bền vững cho chính chúng ta và các thế hệ mai sau.

In the current world, most of the people to celebrate any special occasion by inviting a lot of people. The discussion that throwing too much money to hold parties birthday, marriage or any other special event is a debatable one, with strong logics provided by the supporters of both the views.

A few argue that the special events need to be celebrated grandly, as it happens only a few times in a lifetime. For instance, marriage is considered to occur once in a lifetime and the people want to have the memory of that event until their last breath. This is possible only when the location is well decorated and all of the friends and the neighbours are invited. By spending limited money, it is almost impossible to achieve something special which will be remembered forever. Thus it is obvious, why some people incline towards this point of view.

On the other hand, some people believe that it is not right to spend a huge amount money on personal celebrations as there are a lot of people across the globe under starvation. For example, in most of the African countries, many people do not even have food to eat for a single meal a day. In case, the money spent on celebration can be sent to the people who are really in need, definitely, a lot of life can be saved. Hence, it is clear why a few individuals refute with high spending parties.

Considering the memories of special occasions as well as starvation, spending much money for parties has been supported and refuted by many. Even though memories of some special events are important, saving human life from starvation is more important. Hence, in my opinion, it is necessary to cut down the spending on parties and spend that money for the poor people’s food.

In my opinion, the concern that teenagers spend too much time on social media is valid. While social media can be a useful tool for communication and staying connected with friends, it can also be addictive and take up too much time that could be spent on other activities.

One solution to this problem is for parents to set limits on their children's screen time and encourage them to engage in other activities such as sports, hobbies, and spending time with family and friends. Additionally, schools could educate students about responsible social media use and the negative effects of spending too much time on it.

Another solution is for social media companies to implement features that encourage users to take breaks and limit their time on the platform. For example, Instagram recently introduced a feature that shows users how much time they spend on the app each day and allows them to set a time limit.

Overall, while social media can be a valuable tool for communication and connection, it is important for teenagers to balance their time spent on it with other activities and for parents and schools to play an active role in encouraging responsible use.

Tạm dịch:

Theo tôi, lo ngại rằng thanh thiếu niên dành quá nhiều thời gian cho mạng xã hội là có cơ sở. Mặc dù mạng xã hội có thể là một công cụ hữu ích để giao tiếp và duy trì kết nối với bạn bè, nhưng nó cũng có thể gây nghiện và chiếm quá nhiều thời gian có thể dành cho các hoạt động khác.

Một giải pháp cho vấn đề này là cha mẹ đặt ra giới hạn về thời gian sử dụng thiết bị của con cái họ và khuyến khích chúng tham gia vào các hoạt động khác như thể thao, sở thích và dành thời gian cho gia đình và bạn bè. Ngoài ra, các trường học có thể giáo dục học sinh về việc sử dụng phương tiện truyền thông xã hội có trách nhiệm và những tác động tiêu cực của việc dành quá nhiều thời gian cho nó.

Một giải pháp khác dành cho các công ty truyền thông xã hội là triển khai các tính năng khuyến khích người dùng nghỉ giải lao và giới hạn thời gian của họ trên nền tảng. Ví dụ: Instagram gần đây đã giới thiệu một tính năng cho người dùng biết họ dành bao nhiêu thời gian cho ứng dụng mỗi ngày và cho phép họ đặt giới hạn thời gian.

Nhìn chung, mặc dù mạng xã hội có thể là một công cụ có giá trị để giao tiếp và kết nối, nhưng điều quan trọng đối với thanh thiếu niên là cân bằng thời gian dành cho mạng xã hội với các hoạt động khác, đồng thời để phụ huynh và nhà trường đóng vai trò tích cực trong việc khuyến khích sử dụng có trách nhiệm.

Social media has become an integral part of teenagers' lives, and many people argue that they spend too much time on these platforms. I believe this concern is valid. Excessive social media use can lead to negative effects such as reduced attention spans, decreased face-to-face interactions, and an increased risk of mental health issues like anxiety and depression. Teenagers may also become overly focused on creating a perfect online image, which can lead to feelings of inadequacy and low self-esteem.

To address this issue, both parents and educators should encourage a more balanced approach to social media use. Setting reasonable limits on screen time and promoting offline activities like sports, reading, and hobbies can help. Schools could also incorporate digital literacy programs that teach students about the impact of social media and the importance of maintaining a healthy balance. Ultimately, it’s important to guide teenagers towards using social media responsibly, ensuring it complements their lives rather than dominates them.

Modern era triggered people to create new architecture such as flats and houses. Moreover, most people want building with long lasting whereas others want building quickly and cheaply. I am personally convinced that both of them have some reasons.

To begin with, many architects made amazing design of buildings. Moreover, high technology of modern building forces an architect to improve their design become unique and outstanding. For example, modern people prefer to have their own architect to design their house as a place that they imagine. Certainly, it is need more detail design to build fabulous houses. Next, as we can see the beautiful house from Anang, famous singer in Indonesia, that his house became different with detail ornament likely palace of Arab States. Obviously, people need more money and more time to dream their dream houses becomes true.

Nevertheless, some people prefer an instant flat which are cheaper and quicker than the first house. Perhaps, the important things for them are comfort houses with limited budget. Thus, people will buy house in apartment or home rent area which are available and affordable to reach as quick as they can. In other ways, they do not pay much money because some regency gives them easier of payment by taking monthly payment approximately 100 until 500 USD on each flat. After all, people could add some ornaments in their house from timber or metal. Others they could put the pictures of modern galleries to make their home more fashionable.

From my point of views, people could design their new houses by taking own architect to make a great outstanding houses. Of course, people take much money for creating new design for their lovely houses. Whereas, some people prefer to other flats which are available and affordable. According to Indonesian Minister of Finance, Indonesia people spent fifty percent from their salary for appropriate accommodation such as house and vehicles. Others there are people with less salary who need better flats for living. By that, I think government should help to provide cheaper flats for their citizen with less money. The government could make regulation for create a cheaper flat from them.

To sum up, I agree to both of them that having great outstanding houses are like dreaming for some people who keep much money. Whereas, I think it is better to accommodate other people with minimum salary to live in an affordable flats or apartment by some regulations from government.

Housing is one of basic needs which have to fulfill by people for protecting them from hot, cold, storm, rain and so on. So many dwellings are designed as perfect as possible and spend long time. On the other hand, accommodations are constructed fastly and need no much money. Usually the users of both choices are different depend on their wealth.

　　In my country, house is used by the owner to show prestige and causing many people makes their place to live as their dreams. They choose quality materials, the best circumstance to place their house or employ an architect. The owner hopes the house can last for long time through her or his children. The occupant also can feel comfort in there, while the type of that house needs long time and much money.
　　
　　In contrary, the simple house which needs quick and cheap prize are also needed by some people. For instance the collegian, I am a university student who prefer inexpensive prize flat. In addition, if a disaster happens, the government must give the victims place to stay or live. In 2008, when Tsunami broke Nangroe Aceh Darusalam province, my president commanded social ministry and general disaster tackling organization to construct complexes in the short term. The buildings had no good quality material because the committees had no long time to prepare all properly. They only though, how the Aceh citizens could be still alive.
　　
　　In conclusion, I think that both type of flats or houses are important to be considered as the usage. While the fas accommodations ahould be built by government or private with declining risk management.

Đáp án B

Giải thích: Dựa vào câu: “Some people think playing sports is more fun than watching them on TV.”.

Dịch: Một vài người nghĩ chơi thể thao vui hơn xem chúng trên ti vi.

Bạn có thể giúp tôi viết bài luận này?

Ngày càng có nhiều người sử dụng Internet để gặp gỡ những người mới và giao tiếp xã hội. Một số người nghĩ rằng đã mang mọi người lại gần nhau hơn, trong khi những người khác nghĩ rằng mọi người đang trở nên cô lập hơn.

Thảo luận cả hai và đưa ra ý kiến của bạn.

Tourism is a unique human activity, experienced by millions of people worldwide every year. As people differ in their attitude towards almost everything in life, the same applies also to tourism; where some treat tourism globally as the focus of their act without scrutinising the other related activities pertaining to it. Hence, the term 'responsible tourism" emerged; in order to pay a sufficient attention of the tourist to the local cultural values of the destination country, and – more globally – to the environment. From my point of view, tourism must be labelled as a "responsible activity"; even if it is mandatory to issue as many local and international legislations to make it so.

While making tourism, should the tourist carry his culture with him to the foreign country? Obviously, the answer is "No". If the tourist insists on doing this, he will sure subject himself to great dangers especially in communities with intolerant local citizens. One of the best examples of this is the "Thump Up" sign which is greatly practised in many countries; where this sign is USA means "OK or very good"; while it is considered as very crude and impolite in Greece (which is a famous touristic destination). Thus, it is crucial to teach the tourists a list of common practices that they must refrain from doing, explaining the reasons behind this.

When it comes to the environment, it is indeed very unfortunate to find that the touristic areas are those with the greatest pollution and litter output! A few years ago, it was really surprising that an international campaign of volunteers aimed to clean the Himalayas from the trash left by the climbers.

In conclusion, tourism should be dealt with in the same way as freedom; that it must be "responsible", respecting both the local cultural and environmental values of each society.

All around the world, tourism is losing its glitter, due to the lack of responsibility by the government, tourists and local people. Some people consider taking responsibility in tourism by each individual is essential for the better environment, preserving cultures and improving the economy, whereas others think, this cannot be achieved in reality. In my opinion, tourism responsibility is required for better future of the world and this can be achieved with proper implementation.

People travel to different places but never show any attention or responsibility towards its improvement. To make this world a better place to live in, one should take it as one’s responsibility. First of all, the government should take a step, releasing more funds towards tourism and for providing much security. For instance, we find filthy guest houses, restrooms and no cleaning of surrounding places. People travel to enjoy the beauty of nature, but if they find this kind of dirty places, their enjoyment which lead to a bad memory. Even, local people and tourists who travel should obey the guidelines and policy of tourism for a better world.

However, there are some people who think when it comes to implementation of this; it is like a day dream which cannot come into reality. It is difficult for poor and developing countries to utilise more funds towards tourism. On the other hand, it is difficult to provide security and neatness at tourist spots unless every tourist shows attention as his responsibility. For instance, if there are sign boards which shows ‘please use right direction, danger at left direction’, they use only left and if there are any dustbins with ‘please use me’ , they do not use them at all. Thus it is very difficult to make it into reality.

In conclusion, better tourism can be achieved only if every individual takes the responsibility towards tourism. One should think, how much one is contributing, instead of just arguing and blaming the government. But the government should take the first step in achieving this. With this, not only it increases blissfulness of tourists but also increases economy of the country.